Re: [GSoC] Status Reoprt: Java Project Dependency Builder
Daniel Pocock <email@example.com> writes:
> On 09/06/14 12:54, Matthew Vernon wrote:
> > Would there be value in checking of dependencies that are already
> > packages in Debian, and/or aiming to include more of the
> > more-commonly-used java libs in the distribution?
> If Debian-packaged JARs are visible to Maven when it is running locally,
> then that should be almost effortless. Is that the case though, or is
> there any intention for all packaged JARs to provide a pom.xml?
I think that would be a good aim (they do not currently all do so).
"At least you know where you are with Microsoft."
"True. I just wish I'd brought a paddle."