Re: cofoja vs libcofoja-java
On Thu, Apr 10, 2014 at 05:07:50AM +0200, olivier sallou wrote:
> 2014-04-10 0:30 GMT+02:00 Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org>:
>
> > That was my mistake. I wonder why I didn't find the java team package?
> >
> > Is there a way to retract my package in favor of the java teams?
> >
> Hi,
> I packaged it for Java team because it was (is) a Java library but I made
> it on behalf of the DebianMed team... ;-)
>
> I have seen this duplication yesterday. You packaged latest libcofoja
> version and it replaced mine, that's fine for me, and if everyone agree,
> let's remove cofoja in favor of libcofoja-java as it is a matter of source
> package only, binary package is the same (but version) and as such will not
> impact dependent packages.
So you will file an RM bug to ftpmaster?
Kind regards
Andreas (who had his share in this issue by sponsering the package)
BTW, is there some policy to name Java source packages? I personally
prefer the same source name as the binary name (as Diane did).
--
http://fam-tille.de
Reply to: