Re: cofoja vs libcofoja-java

2014-04-10 0:30 GMT+02:00 Diane Trout <diane@ghic.org>:

That was my mistake. I wonder why I didn't find the java team package?

Is there a way to retract my package in favor of the java teams?

Hi,

I packaged it for Java team because it was (is) a Java library but I made it on behalf of the DebianMed team... ;-)

I have seen this duplication yesterday. You packaged latest libcofoja version and it replaced mine, that's fine for me, and if everyone agree, let's remove cofoja in favor of libcofoja-java as it is a matter of source package only, binary package is the same (but version) and as such will not impact dependent packages.

Olivier

Diane

On Thursday, April 10, 2014 00:13:49 Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I just noticed that cofoja has been packaged twice. There are two source
> packages, cofoja [1] and libcofoja-java [2], that both create a
> libcofoja-java binary package.
>
> - cofoja has been packaged last year by Olivier Sallou for the Debian
> Java Team
> - libcofoja-java has been packaged last month by Diane Trout and Andreas
> Tille for the Debian Med Team
>
> What is the proper way to resolve this conflict?
>
> Emmanuel Bourg
>
> [1] http://packages.qa.debian.org/c/cofoja.html
> [2] http://packages.qa.debian.org/libc/libcofoja-java.html

gpg key id: 4096R/326D8438  (keyring.debian.org)

Key fingerprint = 5FB4 6F83 D3B9 5204 6335  D26D 78DC 68DB 326D 8438