Bonjour Stéfane :) Le mardi 08 février 2011 20:46:27, Stefane Fermigier a écrit : > On Feb 8, 2011, at 8:14 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > > My point is not to discourage you or express scorn or whichever > > negative view on Nuxeo, but just to state the sine qua none conditions > > for a package to enter Debian. > > Out of curiosity, how many large Java application are currently packaged in > Debian ? > > I couldn't find even one personally, on Debian 6.0: > > root@gange# apt-cache search liferay [...] As an example, let's talk about Liferay as I've personnaly started working on Liferay 6.x package [1]. My work is currenty stalled by some serious legal issues on Liferay dependencies... => Liferay depends on "Java Content Repository 2.0" (like Nuxeo I bet) : this API is clearly non-free for Debian (Debian Free Software Guidelines - DFSG) as "Day Licence" doesn't allow modification... [2]. Apache Software Foundation has currently a special exception [3] to their guideline for this particular API : I don't think Debian is ready to sacrifice its DFSG to include something like that in our main archive... I do not even understand how the JCP could accept such a license for such essential component of Java ecosystem... > etc. So it seems either that nobody cares about getting these fine (and > popular) applications into Debian, or it's just too hard to do given the > current set of policies. I *do* care about those software but Debian is not just another "AppStore for .deb packages". Like we care about our users, but we also care about free software, licences, integration, security... I see three way of handling all this : 1) we manage to package all *versionned* dependencies of Nuxeo. Doesn't seem a viable solution : are we supposed to include 13 versions of Log4J or 8 versions of Commons Lang, each for one application in Debian ? 2) We distribute Nexuo with "binary JARs" in non-free repository (which seems a little sad for such an wonderful free software product...) 3) We use already existing Java librairies packages in Debian and packages *all* missing librairies. Nuxeo will then use shared librairies instead of embedded one. But this will break existing QA done by Nuxeo internally... Anyone with better ideas ? [1] http://bugs.debian.org/569819 [2] http://bugs.debian.org/573482 [3] http://www.apache.org/legal/resolved.html#no-modification Cheers, -- Damien - Debian Developper http://wiki.debian.org/DamienRaudeMorvan
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.