On Sun, Jun 26, 2011 at 08:44:23PM -0700, tony mancill wrote: > we needn't manage a larger transition. On the mention of transition, do you know why didn't swt-gtk 3.6 manage to get into testing, although all packages depending on it did migrate to 3.6 ? Note: currently you'll find a "serious" bug against swt-gtk, but that was just filed 9 days ago (swt-gtk & all dependencies were transitioned a month ago) > I'll sponsor the update to swt-gtk and it's rdepends. Thanks, I wanted also to discuss a couple of issues: 1) Bug #631048 is not fixed in 3.7, I'm not even sure that it would fixed in 3.7.x series [1] 2) How about removing the version from package names, ie: libswt-gtk-3.7-java -> libswt-gtk-java libswt-gtk-3.7-jni -> libswt-gtk-jni libswt-gnome-gtk-3.7-jni -> libswt-gnome-gtk-jni libswt-mozilla-gtk-3.7-jni -> libswt-mozilla-gtk-jni libswt-cairo-gtk-3.7-jni -> libswt-cairo-gtk-jni libswt-glx-gtk-3.7-jni -> libswt-glx-gtk-jni libswt-webkit-gtk-3.7-jni -> libswt-webkit-gtk-jni libswt-gtk-3.7-java-gcj -> libswt-gtk-java-gcj Since the API of SWT seems to be not changing. [1] https://bugs.eclipse.org/bugs/show_bug.cgi?id=327696 -- أحمد المحمودي (Ahmed El-Mahmoudy) Digital design engineer GPG KeyID: 0xEDDDA1B7 GPG Fingerprint: 8206 A196 2084 7E6D 0DF8 B176 BC19 6A94 EDDD A1B7
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature