[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: akuma (NEW)

Hi Tony

On Thu, 2011-06-16 at 10:20 +0100, James Page wrote:
> > There seem to be questions regarding the upstream source license.
> The
> > source files themselves don't mention a license, the pom.xml claims
> > the
> > MIT license, while the upstream homepage claims CDDL-1.0.  Since the
> > project some recent upstream activity, perhaps the author could
> > clarify. 
> Good spot; I think that a number of project on java.net now have
> inconsistent project information - there was a large migration onto a
> new platform early this year and I'm not sure all the information on
> the
> website is correct.
> I've raised a bug upstream and contacted Kohsuke (project owner) via
> email to get this resolved.

Resolved - Kohsuke has confirmed that the license should be MIT and has
updated the java.net project site accordingly so should now be


James Page
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Team

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: