[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: RFS: akuma (NEW)

Hi Tony

On Wed, 2011-06-15 at 21:07 -0700, tony mancill wrote:
> There seem to be questions regarding the upstream source license.  The
> source files themselves don't mention a license, the pom.xml claims
> the
> MIT license, while the upstream homepage claims CDDL-1.0.  Since the
> project some recent upstream activity, perhaps the author could
> clarify. 

Good spot; I think that a number of project on java.net now have
inconsistent project information - there was a large migration onto a
new platform early this year and I'm not sure all the information on the
website is correct.

I've raised a bug upstream and contacted Kohsuke (project owner) via
email to get this resolved.

FYI Kohsuke is really keen to see Jenkins in an official distro and has
committed to resolve and blocking issues as quickly as he can.  I know
he is running some Jenkins training at the moment so hopefully he will
pickup end of this week/next week.



James Page
Software Engineer, Ubuntu Server Team

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

Reply to: