Hello again, First of all thanks James for your answer, I have not had time until now to work on the issue but now I can comment some progress that I have made. On Wed, 18 May 2011 14:45:04 +0100 James Page wrote: > Hi Miguel > > On Wed, 2011-05-18 at 11:39 +0200, Miguel Telleria de Esteban wrote: > > > > * Is there a way to disable any test phase in the package? I would > > like to set the property > > > > maven.test.skip = true > > > > but I don't know where, in the debian/ directory place this > > command. > > Set this in debian/maven.properties - it should get picked up > automatically then. I have done so but the tests are still activated. Could it be because I am still using maven-debian-helper 1.1?... I guess not, I will investigate further. Anyway having the tests activated allow me to check the other two issues. > > > > > * Is there an easy way to generate a POM for libmysql-java?. > > Should I > > file a bug on this package?. But I guess it will not be the only > > one not providing POM content. > > Definitely raise a bug; a patch would be great as well - see > http://wiki.debian.org/Java/MavenRepoHelper on how to install the jar > and POM in the right locations by using maven-repo-helper. Done, and it was not that hard to fix the package. Bug report with patch is available. http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=627746 Once I installed the patched package maven does not complain more about missing mysql-connector. On another hand, this package dates from 2009. Is it still maintained? upstream version is much higher. But this is a different issue for now. > > > > > * Why do I have dependency problems with Junit?. This seems to be > > a very common package that should work well with Maven. > > The junit packages install into the maven repo under version numbers > 3.x or 4.x so you will need to add the following rule to > debian/maven.rules to make your package pickup the right version: > > junit junit jar s/4\..*/4.x/ * * Done and it works. > > > > > * I am still using maven-debian-helper 1.1 from squeeze. Should I > > backport the 1.4 version in Sid and Wheezy? > > 1.4 certainly does alot more that 1.1 - especially when generating the > initial package (see mh_make) - in fact it can even pull directly > from a svn repository. I am considering backporting. Cheers, Miguel -- (O-O) ---oOO-(_)-OOo----------------------------------------------------- Miguel TELLERIA DE ESTEBAN http://www.mtelleria.com Email: miguel at mtelleria.com Tel GSM: +34 650 801098 Tel Fix: +34 942 280174 Miembro de http://www.linuca.org Membre du http://www.bxlug.be ¿Usuario captivo o libre? http://www.obtengalinux.org/windows/ Free or captive user? http://www.getgnulinux.org/windows/ -------------------------------------------------------------------
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature