Re: RFS: RSyntaxTextArea (2nd try, updated)
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA256
On 2011-05-11 00:30, Vladimir Kotov wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> On 05/10/2011 12:50 PM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> Hi
>>
>> It mostly looks good, I only have couple of comments. You licensed the
>> debian packaging (incl. patches) as GPL-2. [...]
>>
>> Secondly the license of rsyntaxtextarea (I hate typing that >.>) is
>> LGPL-2.1+ (it has the "or any later" clause).
>
> I have updated to LGPL-2.1+ both for upstream source and debian/*.
> Thanks for clarifying licensing issues to me.
>
>> As far as I can tell, rsyntaxtextarea has not been uploaded to Debian
>> yet, so debian/changelog should only be entry (only with the "* Initial
>> release"-line). Though if you have had it rsyntaxtextarea downloadable
>> from an unofficial APT-repository (e.g. a PPA) or your website, let me
>> know and we keep both entries.
>
> Yes, I have had the package downloadable from PPA.
>
>> Last, there is a new standards version 3.9.2 (lintian might not warn
>> about it because the date line in d/changelog is older than the release
>> date of the new policy).
>
> I have updated standards version to 3.9.2 and refreshed date
> of the last entry in d/changelog.
>
>
Uploaded, thanks for your contribution to Debian. Since this is a new
package it will end up in the NEW queue for a second review by the FTP
masters.
I updated the changelog to explicitly mention which version was the
first to enter Debian, other than that it was uploaded as is. The
change was committed the SVN and it was also tagged.
~Niels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/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=OigU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: