Re: RFS: lwjgl

[Michael Gilbert <michael.s.gilbert@gmail.com>]

Niels Thykier wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
> 
> On 2011-05-07 20:04, Michael Gilbert wrote:
> > Niels Thykier wrote:
> > 
> >> So, turns out I was wrong about javahelper - the package uses
> >> jh_installjavadoc in its override_dh_auto_install, so now it FTBFS.
> >> Though please note that you are missing a jh_clean in the clean
> >> rule/override_dh_auto_clean.
> >>
> >> Also while you have added the B-D for jutils.jar none of the packages
> >> have any relation to said package.  As far as I can tell jinput needs
> >> jutils, but jinput does not have any classpath.  If lwjgl needs jutils
> >> directly (mind you, I do not know if this is the case), then lwjgl needs
> >> a Depends on jutils as well.
> >>   Otherwise, if jutils is in the classpath in d/rules as a workaround
> >> for the missing classpath in jinput, please file a bug against jinput
> >> about this and document in d/rules why jutils is listed in classpath.
> >>   This ought to have been a part of my original review, but I did not
> >> notice jinput did not have a classpath then.
> > 
> > OK, that clarifies things ;)  I've made these updates and pushed.
> > Please review.
> > 
> > Thanks again,
> > Mike
> > 
> 
> Uploaded and tagged.  I noticed that the Standards-Version was outdated,
> but considering I ought to have seen that earlier and it was a no-change
> update, you get it for free this time. :)

Thanks :)

Mike