On 12/17/2010 06:24 AM, Matthias Klose wrote: > On 17.12.2010 15:16, tony mancill wrote: >> On 12/13/2010 03:22 PM, Matthias Klose wrote: >>> On 14.12.2010 00:19, Adam D. Barratt wrote: >>>> On Sun, 2010-08-08 at 17:21 +0200, Florian Weimer wrote: >>>>> * Matthias Klose: >>>>>> For those who are interested in an openjdk-6 update for stable, I did >>>>>> prepare an update for some architectures at >>>>>> >>>>>> deb http://people.debian.org/~doko/archive stable/ >>>>> >>>>> Cool, it's based on OpenJDK 6b18. However, we can't upload it as-is >>>>> because the version number is greater than the one in testing. >>>> >>>> That's no longer the case, fwiw; testing has 6b18-1.8.2-4. >>> >>> so please use the one from unstable, re-generate the control file on a >>> stable system, and re-upload. >>> >>> Matthias >> >> Hello Matthias - >> >> I'm able to build the version from unstable fine (it took 530 minutes... >> :) I want to make sure I understand what you mean by "re-generate the >> control file on a stable system" - this simply means building the >> current source package in a clean squeeze chroot, right? > > before doing this: touch debian/rules && debian/rules debian/control. > > Matthias Hello Matthias, Florian: After tweaking the build-deps a bit to adjust for "lenny-ness," the package builds in a clean i386 lenny chroot, and all of the resulting binary packages install. I have a couple questions: First, I am assuming that I should set the version number to be 6b18-1.8.3-2+lenny1 and upload to stable-security with urgency=high. Can you confirm that this is the desired target? Second, can I simply drop the dependency openjdk-6-jre-headless has on ca-certificates-java? This package doesn't exist in Debian lenny. Thank you for your guidance. Regards, tony
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature