Re: Anyone know what is happening with JspWiki?
You should *not* run install.jsp, the package is supposed to take care of everything that install.jsp does.
On 28.11.2010, at 0.40, David Goodenough wrote:
> There do still seem to be problems with permissions and ownership.
>
> Having added libjabsorb-java and found copies of jstl.jar and standard.jar
> and given write access to things like /usr/share/jspwiki/WEB-INF I got
> a bit further.
>
> If one tries running Install.jsp (and I do not know whether this is still
> supposed to be needed) it says it has already been run. This means that
> I can not set up the password on the admin user. Am I supposed to run
> it?
>
> I have not uses the pkg-java SVN repo before, can I check a deb file
> out from it, or do I have to build from it and if so what is the build
> procedure?
>
> David
>
> On Saturday 27 November 2010, tony mancill wrote:
>> Hi David,
>>
>> Thank you for testing. It sounds like we have a ways to go before we can
>> reasonably ask the release team to include jspwiki in squeeze. I've run
>> the svn-inject to bring the package into the pkg-java SVN repo [1] for
>> team maintenance and will fix the missing dependency on libjabsorb. We
>> can work from repo to sort out the other issues.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Tony
>>
>> [1] svn://svn.debian.org/svn/pkg-java/trunk/jspwiki
>>
>> On 11/27/2010 03:13 AM, David Goodenough wrote:
>>> I just installed it, and it does not install cleanly, but I have not yet
>>> got it to work.
>>>
>>> I notice that in the README.Debian it says that the directory structure
>>> is:-
>>>
>>> /var/lib/jspwiki contains WikiPages and attachments.
>>>
>>> /usr/share/java/webapps/JSPWiki contains the JSP pages, Java libraries,
>>> and page templates.
>>>
>>> /etc/jspwiki contains all configuration files.
>>>
>>> /etc/tomcat6/policy.d/05jspwiki.policy is a symbolic link to
>>> /etc/jspwiki/tomcat.policy
>>>
>>> But there is no directory /usr/share/java/webapps, and these files
>>> seem to be in /usr/share/jspwiki. This however is just a docs error
>>> I think, the ContextPath in jspwiki.xml is correct.
>>>
>>> However when I try to use JSPWiki, I keep getting a message in the
>>> tomcat catalina.out log file:-
>>>
>>> java.lang.IllegalStateException: ContainerBase.addChild: start:
>>> LifecycleException: start: : java.io.IOException: Failed to access
>>> resource /WEB-INF/lib/jabsorb.jar
>>>
>>> Looking in the /usr/share/java directory, jabsorb.jar is indeed missing,
>>> so I guess we have a missing dependency on libjabsorb-java. I also
>>> notice that there are links to files from the tomcat6-webapps package,
>>> which is not listed as a dependency and so I did not have loaded.
>>> Loading libjabsorb-java fixed the first problem, but there is no
>>> tomcat6-webapps package, yet the links refer to
>>> /usr/share/tomcat6-webapps/. Looking at the packages.debian.org
> site,
>>> the jar files references (jstl.jar and standard.jar) only exist in part
>>> of netbeans.
>>>
>>> David
>>>
>>> On Friday 26 November 2010, tony mancill wrote:
>>>> Hi Adnan,
>>>>
>>>> Uploaded to unstable with one additional minor change. In
>>>
>>> jspwiki.postinst
>>>
>>>> gets the tomcat6 user from debconf instead of using the hardcoded
>>>
>>> username
>>>
>>>> "tomcat6" for the chown.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> tony
>>>>
>>>> On 11/26/2010 09:17 AM, tony mancill wrote:
>>>>> I've pulled the package and the changes look good to me (which
> could
>>>
>>> be
>>>
>>>>> because they're almost identical to the changes I worked up locally,
>>>>> but didn't have time to test thoroughly). I think we can reference
>>>>> both the libservlet-2.3 bugs, 576903 and 581024 and I think we
> should
>>>>> list the team address as the maintainer (I'll put your address in the
>>>>> uploader field if you'd like), but but otherwise I'll upload your
>>>>> package as it is on mentors to unstable.
>>>>>
>>>>> I know the time is quite short with respect to the the release, but
>>>>> since the upload addresses a grave bug, it may still be considered.
>>>>> (On the other hand, given the number of changes, I wouldn't be
>>>>> surprised if
>>>
>>> they
>>>
>>>>> opted to pass on this - in any event, the new version is needed in
> the
>>>>> archive.) The best way to communicate with them is to use
> reportbug
>>>
>>> to
>>>
>>>>> file a bug against
>>>>> release.debian.org, then indicate the version of jspwiki and note
> that
>>>>> the upload of 2.8.0-4 addresses the RC bug.
>>>>>
>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>> tony
>>>>>
>>>>> On 11/25/2010 12:00 PM, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
>>>>>>> That's great. Have you uploaded the package and notified the
>>>
>>> release
>>>
>>>>>>> team? I don't see the new version on the PTS page [0] yet.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Sorry, I uploaded package to mentors:
>>>>>> http://mentors.debian.net/cgi-bin/sponsor-
>>>
>>> pkglist?action=details;package
>>>
>>>>>> =jspwiki
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I haven't notified the release team, if you could provide me
> guidance
>>>>>> with what I should tell them, I'll gladly notify them.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Adnan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Thu, Nov 25, 2010 at 6:34 PM, tony mancill
> <tmancill@debian.org>
>>>
>>> wrote:
>>>>>>> Hi Adnan,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> That's great. Have you uploaded the package and notified the
>>>
>>> release
>>>
>>>>>>> team? I don't see the new version on the PTS page [0] yet.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Cheers,
>>>>>>> tony
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> [0] http://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jspwiki.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On 11/25/2010 08:02 AM, Adnan Hodzic wrote:
>>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I just waned to let you know I fixed all the build-deps and as well
>>>>>>>> all the other stuff depending on tomcat5.5 including postinst.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Building and installing works just fine.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Seems like jspwiki will make it into squeeze after all?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Adnan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Mon, Nov 8, 2010 at 6:37 PM, tony mancill
>>>
>>> <tmancill@debian.org> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> On 10/29/2010 07:39 AM, Kalle Kivimaa wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> On 29.10.2010, at 17.14, tony mancill wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>> Any opinions on adding a tomcat dependency? I realise
> that
>>>
>>> it's
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> conceivable to run JspWiki without it, but suspect that the
>>>
>>> vast
>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> majority of users would prefer for the wiki to work
>>>>>>>>>>> "out-of-the-box" (i.e. with minimal setup).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> The dependency was removed due to a user request, so my
>>>
>>> opinion is
>>>
>>>>>>>>>> that it should depend on Tomcat. Yes, you can run JSPWiki
> with
>>>>>>>>>> Jetty, but it is a bit hassle, as I understand it.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Hmmm... for squeeze I think the choices are either to remove
>>>
>>> jspwiki
>>>
>>>>>>>>> entirely or to depend directly on tomcat6.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Any strong opinions or suggestions one way or another?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thank you,
>>>>>>>>> tony
Reply to: