On Fri, Jun 04, 2010 at 05:54:08PM +0900, Charles Plessy wrote: > Le Sun, May 30, 2010 at 11:37:34PM +0100, Roger Leigh a écrit : > When I was trying to solve my problem by myself, I looked for “/proc” as a > keyword in the documentation and did not find a hint that not having it mounted > was a symptom of not using the type I intended. If you think that others may > make a similar error, how about the following patch to the schroot > documentation? > > diff --git a/man/schroot.conf.5.in b/man/schroot.conf.5.in > index 40cec0d..92e08b9 100644 > --- a/man/schroot.conf.5.in > +++ b/man/schroot.conf.5.in > @@ -133,7 +133,8 @@ Plain and directory chroots > .PP > Chroots of type \[oq]plain\[cq] or \[oq]directory\[cq] are directories > accessible in the filesystem. The two types are equivalent except for the fact > -that directory chroots run setup scripts, whereas plain chroots do not. > +that directory chroots run setup scripts, whereas plain chroots do not. As a > +consequence, virtual filesystems like \f[BI]/proc\fP are not mounted in plain chroots. > Additionally, directory chroots implement the \fBfilesystem union chroot\fP > options (see \[lq]\fIFilesystem Union chroot options\fP\[rq], below). > .PP I will add something along these lines to the documentation. Thanks for the suggestion! Regards, Roger -- .''`. Roger Leigh : :' : Debian GNU/Linux http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/ `. `' Printing on GNU/Linux? http://gutenprint.sourceforge.net/ `- GPG Public Key: 0x25BFB848 Please GPG sign your mail.
Description: Digital signature