[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Solving the default-jdk-builddep mess

Matthew Johnson wrote:
> On Mon Apr 26 19:58, Torsten Werner wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 26, 2010 at 7:45 PM, Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net> wrote:
>>> What do you feel about this solution; we rename "default-jdk-builddep"
>>> to "gcj-native-helper" and have it only pull gcj-jdk (if available) or
>>> nothing at all.
>>>  When updating Build-rdepends we will have to add default-jdk as well
>>> to get the default-java as well. The rationale being that it is not
>>> there to provide a default-jdk, but what you need to create gcj packages.
>>> We have a "short transition" period where gcj-native-helper provides
>>> default-jdk-builddep and still Depends on default-jdk while we fix our
>>> packages. Once that is done we remove the provides and the Depends on
>>> default-jdk.
>> Sounds good to me!
> Matt

Ok, I will start with this on next upload of java-common, unless I hear


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply to: