Re: Solving the default-jdk-builddep mess
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Matthew Johnson schrieb:
> AIUI you were complaining about the specific use of gcj-jdk. I'm suggesting
> that we have a meta package for jdk and a metapackage for -gcj packages and
> depend on jdk, -gcj; rather than what we have at the moment which is a jdk
> metapackage and a jdk-gcj metapackage, and you depend on one or the other.
We should come up with a name - gcj-native-helper maybe?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----