On Mon Apr 12 19:57, Matthias Klose wrote:
On 12.04.2010 14:40, Torsten Werner wrote:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Matthew Johnson schrieb:
AIUI you were complaining about the specific use of gcj-jdk. I'm suggesting
that we have a meta package for jdk and a metapackage for -gcj packages and
depend on jdk, -gcj; rather than what we have at the moment which is a jdk
metapackage and a jdk-gcj metapackage, and you depend on one or the other.
We should come up with a name - gcj-native-helper maybe?
if this is available on all archs and doesn't do anything if gcj is not
available, then yes.
Yes, although if you are trying to build a -gcj package on an architecture
which does not have gcj, possibly failing the dependency is actually correct....