Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: > On 15/02/2010 21:28, Niels Thykier wrote: >> Hi >> >> I have filed an RM on jamvm (#570009). I have not filed anything on >> cacao yet. >> >> Damien Raude-Morvan wrote: >>> So on "cacao" case, I'm against dropping this package : >>> - "cacao" source package generate "cacao-source" which if a >>> Build-Depends of openjdk-6 >> Actually, it seems like "cacao-source" now builds "cacao-source" (since >> Auguest 2009 or so); so cacao itself should not affect openjdk anymore. >> Do you still want to keep cacao then? > > > Thanks Niels and Matthias for spoting my mistake on this. > If "cacao-source" binary package is provided by another source package, > you cancel my previous mail. > > Cheers, Alright, then I will put cacao back on the list of things to get RM'ed. I will file the RM Sunday or Monday; please voice objections (if any) before then. ~Niels
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature