[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Considering RM of jamvm and cacao



Vincent Fourmond wrote:
> [...]
>   +1. We basically only need openjdk and gcj (and the cacao variant of
> openjdk, which is performing much better on some platforms, it seems).
> 
> 

Hi

Just for clarification, by "the cacao variant of openjdk" did you mean
"icedtea-6-jre-cacao", which is a part of the openjdk-6 source package?

I will just give a couple of days for people to reply to this - assuming
no one objects, I will (probably) file the RMs on Monday or Tuesday.

~Niels

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


Reply to: