Re: RFS: libnanoxml2-java (updated package)
> You need a default which is a real package and satisfiable on all
> architectures, which openjdk is not. If you don't explicitly need openjdk, then
> you should have default-jre as the concrete depends (which is openjdk on most
> platforms).
>
Fixed.
>> Not sure what you mean here. Doesn't java2-runtime-headless include
>> all packages in java5-runtime-headless and java6-runtime-headless? Do
>
> Um, maybe. I include them all.
>
Just double checked. They are. Should I still change it to include
them? (I assumed java2-runtime-headless is meant to be a superset
including all java5 and java6 runtimes by design and not accident) The
version I just uploaded to mentors still only depend on
java2-runtime-headless but I could add java5-runtime-headless and
java6-runtime-headless if it's wanted.
Sincerely
Sveinung
Reply to: