On Thu Feb 04 21:36, Sveinung Kvilhaugsvik wrote: > > - If you are build-depending on default-jdk, why are you then depending on > > openjdk? > OpenJDK is just the default unless another dependency in > java2-runtime-headless is installed. The idea was to ensure repeatable > builds if another packages depend on nanoxml. I think I got it from > one of the above mentioned policy files. Is it wrong to do this now? You need a default which is a real package and satisfiable on all architectures, which openjdk is not. If you don't explicitly need openjdk, then you should have default-jre as the concrete depends (which is openjdk on most platforms). > > - shouldn't you also depend on java5 and java6 virtual packages in the > > alternate depends? > Not sure what you mean here. Doesn't java2-runtime-headless include > all packages in java5-runtime-headless and java6-runtime-headless? Do Um, maybe. I include them all. Matt -- Matthew Johnson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature