Re: Ivy problems when trying to package mondrian
On Thu, Oct 01, 2009 at 01:20:37PM +0200, Andreas Tille wrote:
> On Thu, 1 Oct 2009, Michael Koch wrote:
>
> >org/apache/ivy/ant/antlib.xml is located inside ivy.jar. The problem is that its
> >not loaded from there. Could be classpath issue. Are you sure you use the correct
> >jar?
>
> No, I'm not. How can I force the correct one?
>
> My first try was with a simple debhelper rules file containing just
>
> %:
> dh $@
>
> Now I tried copying from ivy:
>
> include /usr/share/cdbs/1/class/ant.mk
> include /usr/share/cdbs/1/rules/debhelper.mk
>
> PACKAGE := $(DEB_SOURCE_PACKAGE)
> VERSION := $(DEB_UPSTREAM_VERSION)
> MVN_VERSION := $(shell echo $(VERSION) | sed 's/~/-/')
> JAVA_HOME := /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk
> DEB_ANT_BUILD_TARGET := jar javadoc
>
>
> But the problem remains:
>
> debian/rules build
> test -x debian/rules
> mkdir -p "."
> cd . && /usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/bin/java -classpath /usr/share/ant/lib/ant.jar:/usr/share/ant/lib/ant-launcher.jar:/usr/lib/jvm/java-6-openjdk/lib/tools.jar -Dant.home=/usr/share/ant org.apache.tools.ant.Main -Dcompile.debug=true -Dcompile.optimize=true jar javadoc
> Buildfile: build.xml
>
> version:
>
> download-ivy:
>
> install-ivy:
> [taskdef] Could not load definitions from resource org/apache/ivy/ant/antlib.xml. It could not be found.
>
> BUILD FAILED
> /home/tillea/debian-maintain/todo/mondrian_olap/mondrian-3.1.2.13008/build.xml:325: Problem: failed to create task or type antlib:org.apache.ivy.ant:settings
>
>
> Where can I read about forcing classpath or something like this?
With CDBS it would be a simple DEB_JARS variable. There are also plenty of
examples in the archive for packages using ant and cdbs.
I font know how good the ant support in dh7 already is. I know no package
already using it. That doesnt mean there is none...
One issue I already see in your debian/rules snipped: Why do you depend
on openjdk6 and not on default-jdk? The later is the prefered if the package
builds with either openjdk6 or gcj.
Cheers,
Michael
Reply to: