On Tue Aug 04 14:34, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > Hmmm... I guess Matthew will have a more definite opinion than me > about that. In any case, don't use lintian overrides unless you have a > very good reason for that. I guess more packages are in this case. For > now, keeping the lintian warning is fine, I think, and then we can > point to the lintian maintainers that some files can be executables > even if they are not scripts/elf provided the packages depends on > binfmt-support. I have submitted a bug about this already: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=539315 Matt -- Matthew Johnson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature