Re: RFS: libmx4j-java (updated package)
Hi Damien,
On Wed, 11 Mar, 2009 at 10:45:30PM +0100, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> Hi Varun,
>
> On Tuesday 10 March 2009 23:30:20 Varun Hiremath wrote:
> > Hi Damien,
> >
> > On Tue, 10 Mar, 2009 at 12:13:49AM +0100, Damien Raude-Morvan wrote:
> > > Dear mentors,
> > >
> > > I am looking for a sponsor for the new version 3.0.2-5
> > > of package "libmx4j-java" :
> >
> > Looks good. Uploaded.
>
> It's time for my first "brown paper bag release" ;(
>
> libmx4j-java 3.0.2-5 won't build |1] because I've made two mistakes :
>
> - I've moved some java libraries from B-D to B-D-I without thinking this
> particular package have an architecture-dependent package (libmx4j-java-gcj).
> To build this package, we rebuild a JAR file then dh_nativejava in the "build"
> target of debian/rules so we need to keep all this libs in B-D.
> A pbuilder env. auto install B-D *and* B-D-I so I haven't seen this when
> building locally. I'm currently setting up a local sbuild...
>
> - openjdk-6-jdk is not available on m68k and s390 wheras java-gcj-compat is.
> libmx4j-java is a dependency of java-gcj-compat-headless which in turn is a
> dependency of java-gcj-compat-dev | default-jdk-builddep.
> So with this 3.0.2-5 upload, java-gcj-compat-dev or default-jdk-builddep were
> uninstallable on those arch because of a missing openjdk-6-jdk.
>
> I'm really sorry for all this garbage. I hope someone will sponsor my new
> 3.0.2-6 soon to revert this nasty issues.
Sorry, I too missed that, but there still seems to be some
problem. The new package still fails to build on many archs and I am
not sure why. Could you please check?
Regards,
Varun
Reply to: