Re: Rename JTA?
Michael Koch wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 02:55:28PM +0100, Paul Cager wrote:
>> I am preparing a new upload of JTA to fix some bugs.
>>
>> The source package is "jta" and the binary package is "jta". Should I
>> change the binary package to be "libjta-java", or leave it alone?
>>
>> * Jta has no reverse dependencies.
>> * I'll be adding a "-doc" binary package, so it will end up in the
>> new queue anyway.
>
> Is jta only a library package or does it include a standalone tool?
>
> In the first case you should rename it. In the later case I would
> prefer to keep the name. This would be the same situation as for ant or
> checkstyle.
It doesn't provide an executable in /usr/bin (unlike ant), but it does
provide a useful Main class in the Jar (like checkstyle). So I think
that implies keep it as "jta".
Reply to: