Re: Rename JTA?

[Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de>]

On Sun, Apr 22, 2007 at 02:55:28PM +0100, Paul Cager wrote:
> I am preparing a new upload of JTA to fix some bugs.
> 
> The source package is "jta" and the binary package is "jta". Should I
> change the binary package to be "libjta-java", or leave it alone?
> 
>   *  Jta has no reverse dependencies.
>   *  I'll be adding a "-doc" binary package, so it will end up in the
> new queue anyway.

Is jta only a library package or does it include a standalone tool?

In the first case you should rename it. In the later case I would
prefer to keep the name. This would be the same situation as for ant or
checkstyle.


Cheers,
Michael
-- 
 .''`.  | Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de>
: :' :  | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `'   |
  `-    | 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B