Re: checkstyle Java library - binary package name
Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
> On 1/11/07, Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de> wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 06:51:08PM -0000, Paul Cager wrote:
>> > Regarding the packaging of the new upstream version of checkstyle.
>> As it
>> > is a library, should I rename the binary package to
>> libcheckstyle-java, or
>> > would this cause far too many problems?
>>
>> We discussed this specific case a long time ago and this package is
>> both: a library and a command. I vote for leaving the name as it is.
>
> Seconded.
>
+1; checkstyle definitely falls into that dual-role status we've
discussed in the past.
--
Barry Hawkins
All Things Computed
site: http://www.alltc.com
weblog: http://www.yepthatsme.com
Registered Linux User #368650
Reply to: