Re: checkstyle Java library - binary package name
On Thu, Jan 11, 2007 at 06:51:08PM -0000, Paul Cager wrote:
> Regarding the packaging of the new upstream version of checkstyle. As it
> is a library, should I rename the binary package to libcheckstyle-java, or
> would this cause far too many problems?
We discussed this specific case a long time ago and this package is
both: a library and a command. I vote for leaving the name as it is.
Michael
--
.''`. | Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de>
: :' : | Free Java Developer <http://www.classpath.org>
`. `' |
`- | 1024D/BAC5 4B28 D436 95E6 F2E0 BD11 5923 A008 2763 483B
Reply to: