Re: java-compiler
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Charles Fry wrote:
>>>I couldn't help but noticing that the virtual packages for Java runtime
>>>environments are now java1-runtime and java2-runtime, while the Java
>>>compilter virtual packages are java-compiler and java2-compiler. Would
>>>it not be more consistent to have java1-compiler and java2-compiler?
>>>
>>>Charles
>>>
>>
>>We would probably be best served by consolidating to just java-compiler,
>>since java1 is so irrelevant at this point.
>
>
> That sounds reasonable. Especially given that a quick inspection of the
> most popular compilers indicates that they all provide java-compiler,
> and noone uses 1 or 2.
>
> Would it not be equally reasonable to combine java1-runtime and
> java2-runtime?
[...]
+1 on that suggestion as well. It has been discussed before and IIRC
most of us are in favor of it. Others please weigh in with a +/-1 and
any comments/concerns. A big thanks to Charles for investing the time
to build our concensus on several things and move things forward these days.
Regards,
- --
Barry Hawkins
All Things Computed
site: www.alltc.com
weblog: www.yepthatsme.com
Registered Linux User #368650
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.2 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFDv42gHuKcDICy0QoRAmgCAJ4wGi2BfVK8/JcZsBaW8BldLlv3jQCffPPU
OCoct22VJGOcY3LxtpbZypw=
=lN54
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: