> > I couldn't help but noticing that the virtual packages for Java runtime > > environments are now java1-runtime and java2-runtime, while the Java > > compilter virtual packages are java-compiler and java2-compiler. Would > > it not be more consistent to have java1-compiler and java2-compiler? > > > > Charles > > > We would probably be best served by consolidating to just java-compiler, > since java1 is so irrelevant at this point. That sounds reasonable. Especially given that a quick inspection of the most popular compilers indicates that they all provide java-compiler, and noone uses 1 or 2. Would it not be equally reasonable to combine java1-runtime and java2-runtime? Charles -- Be No Longer Lather's slave Treat yourself to Burma-Shave http://burma-shave.org/jingles/1930/be
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature