Re: Javadoc policy
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Michael Koch wrote:
| On Mon, Mar 14, 2005 at 06:26:55PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote:
|
|>Sat, 12 Mar 2005 23:43:55 -0600,
|>Jerry Haltom <wasabi@larvalstage.net> wrote:
|>
|>
|>>On Sun, 2005-03-13 at 00:28 -0500, Barry Hawkins wrote:
[...]
|>>Yes definitely. However, using /usr/share/javadoc would put us in line
|>>with JPackage. And I think it's a good idea too. Even if we link
|>>from /usr/share/javadoc to /usr/share/doc/package/api.
|>
|>I'm not sure we can create /usr/share/javadoc without discussing it on
|>debian-devel@lists.debian.org!
|
|
| And probably LSB/FHSSTD too.
[...]
~ Centralization of the files really doesn't provide much gain; it's
just like when you link your own apps to the Javadoc of APIs and
frameworks that you use. Even if it were in the same master folder,
you'd still have to find the path and place in your own packaged
Javadocs for the -link and -linoffline facility.
~ I don't see JPackage as either an endorsement or a recommendation
for taking a particular approach. Several of the practices I have heard
of reflect a choice of expediency over sound practice, which I believe
goes against the Debian Way of doing things.
- --
Barry Hawkins
All Things Computed
site: www.alltc.com
weblog: www.yepthatsme.com
Registered Linux User #368650
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFCNuX87bZ6kUftWZwRAklPAKCbuJruQ6IlijU+5/MZEA+Eh7ZcDQCgwkhA
f+D8iMRGyyrObvh9VGRMsms=
=CBQU
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: