Re: GCJ Native Proposal
Tue, 3 May 2005 15:08:49 +0200,
Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de> wrote:
> On Tue, May 03, 2005 at 08:45:52AM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote:
>> I think some of upstream agrees with me. I don't think calling it bcabi
>> was ever officially intended.
>>
>> I think mjw (who is that, Mark?) recommended against both -jbi and
>> -bcabi and for -gcj. I'm on board with that if we can get other
>> agreement.
>
> When you re-read the list you will see that I was for -gcj from start.
Not me ;-) but well, if I'm the only one...
--
.''`.
: :' :rnaud
`. `'
`-
Java Trap: http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html
Reply to: