Re: GCJ Native Proposal

To: Jerry Haltom <wasabi@larvalstage.net>
Cc: debian-java@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: GCJ Native Proposal
From: Michael Koch <konqueror@gmx.de>
Date: Tue, 3 May 2005 07:43:58 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 20050503054358.GC29272@asterix.konqueror.de>
Mail-followup-to: Jerry Haltom <wasabi@larvalstage.net>, debian-java@lists.debian.org
In-reply-to: <1114896379.9135.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>
References: <1110654804.9890.29.camel@localhost.localdomain> <20050315131458.GG5016@papacharly.konqueror.de> <4236E6F9.1070107@alltc.com> <87ekcsyr8r.fsf@oz.fapse.ulg.ac.be> <20050430192858.GI11599@asterix.konqueror.de> <1114896379.9135.3.camel@localhost.localdomain>

On Sat, Apr 30, 2005 at 04:26:19PM -0500, Jerry Haltom wrote:
> I have no idea what Ubuntu is going to do, as I ran out of time to do
> it. I will assuradly do what Debian does, so I'm here to influence
> Debian's decision. ;). Either way, I think bcabi is a stupid name. Even
> spelled out it doesn't say anything "binary compatible application
> binary interface". Binary compatible with what? It doesn't say anything
> at all. Even -native would be better.

You can curse upstream's name for it but you cant eliminate it.


Michael
-- 
Escape the Java Trap with GNU Classpath!
http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/java-trap.html

Join the community at http://planet.classpath.org/

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: GCJ Native Proposal
  - From: Jerry Haltom <wasabi@larvalstage.net>

Prev by Date: remove xml-soap, lib-saxon-java, libservlet2.2-java
Next by Date: Re: GCJ Native Proposal
Previous by thread: Re: GCJ Native Proposal
Next by thread: Re: GCJ Native Proposal
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread