On Thu, Mar 04, 2004 at 01:14:56PM +0100, Arnaud Vandyck wrote: > > And 7.4 details how the QA handles orphaning packages maintained by > > inactive maintainers. > > I'd like someone to point me where is the reference of the ITH?! It's > the second time I read about ITH but I don't know where to send an ITH? > debian-qa@l.d.o? file a bug against wnpp? I had the same problem earlier this week (see -devel). This procedure is not quite fully documented at best, and a little confusing at worst. It seems the best idea is to just write -qa with "details you have collected" (whatever they are) and they'll do something about it. In my case, Martin added my information to the MIA database (?) and agreed with me that it was OK for me to hijack epydoc, since Moshe Zadka has been impossible to find. (Martin did this wearing his "QA Team" hat, not his "DPL" hat, as far as I understand.) In your case, things are not as straightforward - since Ean, unlike Moshe, is actually communicating with you. However, it still seems best to just let the QA team sort things out. They should be able to advise you on what else to do if you continue to feel that a hijack is justified. KEN -- Kenneth J. Pronovici <pronovic@debian.org>
Attachment:
pgpQVS70Wexpf.pgp
Description: PGP signature