Re: free-java-sdk usage
W liście z pon, 07-06-2004, godz. 04:28, Arnaud Vandyck pisze:
> "Grzegorz B. Prokopski" <email@example.com> writes:
> > I could not add libgnujaxp-java as a Dependency of sablevm, because this
> > -java package depends on some native pieces (libgnujaxp-jni) that are
> > not available on one of the platforms SableVM supports in Debian.
> > Probably a wishlist bug against jaxp package would be in order.
> I thought jaxp was included in sablevm?
The sources are included in sablevm-classlib, because that's what the
upstream does, but they are not built nor installed.
> You should event Provides: jaxp, don't you?
Hmm... libjaxp1.2-java doesn't provide a virtual package called "jaxp".
But to answer your question: even if we had this code included in
our basic class libraries, it wouldn't replace & conflict & provide
Inside our class-library sources we should have a better handling
of such situations. I am working on it. But this is not a showstopper
for now, I think. And I wouldn't want to just include this code into
Debian archive once again, w/o any visible benefit, when there already
exist a package that provides this functionality and using it seems to
work just fine.
Grzegorz B. Prokopski
Grzegorz B. Prokopski <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org
SableVM - LGPLed JVM http://www.sablevm.org
Why SableVM ?!? http://devel.sablevm.org/wiki/WhySableVM