[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

eight packages could possibly go to main!



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi all,

I've been working on the MovingJavaToMain page[1] and it seems that
eight packages could possibly go to main:

   1. Package: libjdom-java (QA - Bugs)
      I've been able to build it with kaffe 1.1.3

   2. Package: libcommons-pool-java (QA - Bugs)
      I've been able to build it with kaffe 1.1.3

   3. Package: libcommons-collections-java (QA - Bugs)
      I've been able to build it with kaffe 1.1.3

   4. Package: libcommons-dbcp-java (QA - Bugs)
      Why in Contrib: wait for libcommons-pool-java
      and libcommons-collections-java to be in main.

   5. Package: libcommons-logging-java (QA - Bugs)
      I've been able to build it with kaffe 1.1.3

   6. Package: gjdoc (QA - Bugs)
      I'm working on an alternative but I need some help,
      see classpathx-gnujaxp mailing list archive[2]

   7. Package: liblogkit-java (QA - Bugs)
      Does not need all these dependencies to build and
      can be built with kaffe 1.1.3...
      but he documentation cannot be build...
      maybe this is too important to be removed

   8. Package: liblog4j1.2-java (QA - Bugs)
      This package is in a very bad shape! See #221236 and #230441...
      The package also needs Swing...
      (maybe we can split the two packages sources...)

I think maybe more packages can go to main after some of those  will be
in main.

How to help?

If you are the maintainer of those, do the job. If you are not a
maintainer or not the maintainer of those, send patches so the
maintainer only have to apply and upload.

Many thanks for your help,

Footnotes: 
[1] http://java.debian.net/index.php/MovingJavaToMain
[2] http://mail.gnu.org/archive/html/classpathx-discuss/2004-02/msg00005.html

- -- 
  .''`. 
 : :' :rnaud
 `. `'  
   `-    
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFAMfVL4vzFZu62tMIRAiNAAKCuGMleJ20fC6GHUMruJ4fj+kuCMwCeKxup
DmlSMVq58epfTsuysIrV6wQ=
=H//R
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: