Le lun, 02/02/2004 à 12:22 +0100, debian@katzien.de a écrit : > Hallo, > > Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > I've added a few more points that should answer your questions. Please > > tell me if it is so (and other JPP/Debian/Gentoo... folks please check > > if it also represents your packaging processes) > > From some discussion on normal debian packages, I would say, that > upstream should not put in the debian/* files (^=RPM spec files). It's > fine to include the actuall files of the to be done 'common java > packaging package description', but a debian devloper will need to > change something in the debian dir and so the this files will get out of > sync during each build. Usually upstream releases with a debian dir will > have that dir removed and the upstream tarball redone. > > If we get to a point, were we have a common policy, and even names will > work across packaging level, then the description files would be fine. > Up to then, it's a waste of upstream recourses. Sure. This is more or less what I wanted to imply in my « What we are not talking about (yet) » point. If you feel you can clarify it, please do so - the difficult part is to have something that an upstream developer can understand without quoting all the subtleties of present and future linux packaging. Regards, -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=