Re: j2sdk build-depends cannot be satisfied?
On Fri, Nov 22, 2002 at 09:11:06AM -0800, Stephen Zander wrote:
> >>>>> "Ola" == Ola Lundqvist <opal@debian.org> writes:
> Ola> I do not know that short form WTF. If they are installable
> Ola> does not matter. If it is completely useless then it has to
> Ola> depend on somekind of runtime at least. Just as with any
> Ola> other dependencies. :)
>
> WTF -> What the F(&(*&^(^*%k
>
> >From the rest of your paragraph I think we're in agreement that only
> depending on java-common is wrong and that these packages should also
> be depending on java1-runtime. If so, I'll announce my intention to
> perform a mass bug filling against these packages on -devel.
That sounds good. If you file bugs then try to give good examples
on how to write the dependency.
I'll change a sentence in the policy so the proposed word will
vanish. :)
Regards,
// Ola
> --
> Stephen
>
> "Sixty percent of all Americans say they flew the flag after Sept. 11,
> 2001. Last week, less than 40 percent of registered voters cast
> ballots. Americans who wrap themselves in patriotic colors, yet can't
> be bothered to exercise the most fundamental right and responsibility
> in a democracy, betray the country they claim to love."
> -- Christina Hulbe, Letters to the Editor, The Orgeonian, 10
> Nov. 2002
>
>
> --
> To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-java-request@lists.debian.org
> with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org
>
--
--------------------- Ola Lundqvist ---------------------------
/ opal@debian.org Annebergsslingan 37 \
| opal@lysator.liu.se 654 65 KARLSTAD |
| +46 (0)54-10 14 30 +46 (0)70-332 1551 |
| http://www.opal.dhs.org UIN/icq: 4912500 |
\ gpg/f.p.: 7090 A92B 18FE 7994 0C36 4FE4 18A1 B1CF 0FE5 3DD9 /
---------------------------------------------------------------
Reply to: