[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?

On Friday 07 September 2001 19:26, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > 	Perhaps we should wait a few days to see if any others have
> > 	comments/thoughts they would like to add, as I'm more than interested
> > 	in hearing any other proposals, comments, etc.
> Yes, that sounds like a good idea... i have been reading this discussion,
> and packaged Jmol for Debian as a non-maintainer (with comments from some
> Debian people) i recognize the problem as Jmol needs J2 as well...
> I totally agree with your plans to change the policy to include a
> java2-virtual-machine concept...

Forgot to say... maybe you can start a new email thread with a title like
"PROPOSAL: Java policy change: java2-virtual-machine"
"RFC: Java policy change: java2-virtual-machine"


Reply to: