Re: Packages that require Java 2 ?
Hi Egon,
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> On Friday 07 September 2001 19:26, Egon Willighagen wrote:
> > > Perhaps we should wait a few days to see if any others have
> > > comments/thoughts they would like to add, as I'm more than interested
> > > in hearing any other proposals, comments, etc.
> >
> > Yes, that sounds like a good idea... i have been reading this discussion,
> > and packaged Jmol for Debian as a non-maintainer (with comments from some
> > Debian people) i recognize the problem as Jmol needs J2 as well...
> >
> > I totally agree with your plans to change the policy to include a
> > java2-virtual-machine concept...
>
> Forgot to say... maybe you can start a new email thread with a title like
> "PROPOSAL: Java policy change: java2-virtual-machine"
> or
> "RFC: Java policy change: java2-virtual-machine"
Thanks for your comments. Much appreciated.
Yes, I'm going to write up a little proposal that's readable for
everyone that hasn't followed the discussion in detail and send it in
middle of next week or so with a title like you suggested. Then we can
all thrash it out and turn it into something useful! :-)
Thanks again. :-)
Cheers,
Marcus
--
.....
,,$$$$$$$$$, Marcus Crafter
;$' '$$$$: Computer Systems Engineer
$: $$$$: Open Software Associates GmbH
$ o_)$$$: 82-84 Mainzer Landstrasse
;$, _/\ &&:' 60327 Frankfurt Germany
' /( &&&
\_&&&&' Email : Marcus.Crafter@osa.de
&&&&. Business Hours : +49 69 9757 200
&&&&&&&:
Reply to: