Re: mod_jserv and the Java policy
On Wednesday 4 August 1999, at 19 h 56, the keyboard of Stefan Gybas
> Maybe we should add a section about where to put servlets,
May be. But remember that a Policy which do not cover everything is better
than no Policy.
> > It should at least depends on java-common and may be on
> > java-virtual-machine instead of the specific jdk, which is
> > non-free.
> Why should it depend on java-common? It requires a JVM, so a dependency
> on java-virtual-machine should be enough. Your policy says:
You're right. The Policy is not clear about that. I'll reword it.
> > Libraries packages MUST be named lib-XXX-java.
> I'm strictly against this. I suggest java-XXX instead.
Hmmm, may be. See bug/wishlist #41113 "[PROPOSED] Naming Conventions for modules" against debian-policy before we find a Java-only solution.