Re: OT: Acroynyms [was Re: JBoss]

To: <debian-java@lists.debian.org>
Subject: Re: OT: Acroynyms [was Re: JBoss]
From: Tollef Fog Heen <tollef@add.no>
Date: 06 Dec 2001 16:16:18 +0100
Message-id: <[🔎] 878zcgbcql.fsf@arabella.intern.opera.no>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 01120609104906.01126@localhost.localdomain>
References: <[🔎] Pine.LNX.4.33.0112051714080.16167-100000@gradall.private.brainfood.com> <[🔎] 01120609104906.01126@localhost.localdomain>

* Mark Bucciarelli 

| One thing I have found challenging is the number of acronyms debian folks 
| use, both on this list and in news releases.  Could someone please define 
| the following:

:)

| NMU

Non maintainer upload, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-nmu

| ITP

Intent to package, see
http://www.debian.org/doc/developers-reference/ch-upload#s6.1

| RC

Release critical, bugs which are priority serious or higher.

| BTS

Bug tracking system, http://bugs.debian.org

-- 

Tollef Fog Heen
Axiom #1: You Can't Win

Reply to:

References:
- Re: JBoss
  - From: Adam Heath <doogie@brainfood.com>
- OT: Acroynyms [was Re: JBoss]
  - From: Mark Bucciarelli <mark@easymailings.com>

Prev by Date: Bug#122699: Include definitions for common Debian acronyms
Next by Date: Re: get some for the holidays
Previous by thread: Bug#122699: Include definitions for common Debian acronyms
Next by thread: Re: OT: Acroynyms [was Re: JBoss]
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread