Re: Oracle on Debian.. or Red Hat?
If you have any support from Oracle, it will be useless the moment they
figure out you are not running their software on a supported OS. If you
don't ever need their direct support (ie. open a case and send requested
log files, etc), you may get away running Oracle on Debian.
I did it a long time ago, back in the 8i days. It ran better on Debian
than on the supported Suse version we had to install it on later due to
a manager's paranoia. Just be sure you are using the same library
versions that the supported redhat offers. But test for yourself as
Carlos suggests to be sure.
OTH, you may entice your sysadmins to play with redhat by suggesting
them that being savvy in it may add value to their resumes.
If you choose to go the redhat way, I suggest you use the oracle
version of redhat (oracle enterprise linux), as they've made it
ridiculously easy to install and support their products (yum repos and a
package called something like: oracle-install-ready.rpm).
On 10/28/2011 09:00 AM, Carlos Bergero wrote:
Just to mess with you, you have a couple of Oracle over RH and other
over Debian, if they have similar load/use/etc, cant you get some
stability measures from both servers and evaluate it? May be you
already try this, so sorry but that would be the best evaluation.
El 03/06/11 01:55, Timur Irmatov escribió:
Currently all our servers run Debian, with just a couple of Oracle
servers under Red Hat. We have a couple Oracle servers under Debian
too. We're using Red Hat because our consultant says that Oracle runs
much more stable with Red Hat than Debian. Our team of system
administrators prefers Debian and does not want to support Red Hat
servers, if possible.
Do you have any strong evidence/ experience that support this claim
that Red Hat is better for Oracle than Debian? Any advice on this?