Re: Avoid not authenticated forged mail
Carlos Acedo wrote:
> Thank you for your replies, I was considering DKIM, but I was afraid of
> the overhead, but I think it's worth after all. I will also take a look
> to the SPF records as well.
To my experience, even with EXTREMELY busy email servers (with like one
incoming per second or more), dkimproxy is performing pretty well.
Others have reported the same, and everyone is happy with it. I never
heard any complain, unlike with tumgreyspf that is having issues with
it's file system based greylisting db that has created issues.