Re: SNMP

[Boris Pavlov <edi@elib.minfin.bg>]

Alex wrote:
> Andrew Miehs wrote:
> > On 28/03/2009, at 11:00 AM, Alex <trace.localhost@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Could you be more specific? I don't see how this thread is related 
> > > to BGP
> > > Boris Pavlov wrote:
> >
> > If it is a router with a full bgp feed you will end up with a lot of 
> > routes which you will also hit with your snmpwalk
> It's not a router, i specified that it's a switch ( L2 )
the problem is not with the bgp itself but trying to walk too many 
objects, without expecting it.
it showed up first with bgp routers and (in my case) OV, with the 
default discovery. it was a long time ago, about the last millennium, 
and is kinda funny answer - 'you've got bgp problem', when used in SNMP 
context.

sorry for any inconvenience.

so, you can have BGP problem with your SNMP, please, share back what 
results you've got with tcpdump.

edi.