[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: alternatives to suexec in etch apache2

On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 11:30:32PM +0100, Marc Haber wrote:
> On Sun, Feb 17, 2008 at 11:20:07AM +1100, Craig Sanders wrote:
> >  Please note that this MPM is highly experimental, and is not from
> >  the same tree as the other MPMs.
> It's that sentence that has scared me away from apache2-mpm-itk.
> On my systems, I have a dedicated apache process per virtual host, and
> use another apache as reverse proxy to route incoming requests to the
> correct virtual host. But that, of course, doesn't scale very well,
> and it not (yet) well supported by the Debian apache2 packages.

it's worked well for me for almost a year.

not, i hasten to add, in a high-load situation.


i see that warning as being like the name 'unstable' in debian. it's
there to scare away the careless, those who don't know how to test
things before putting them into production use.

try it on a testbed machine, put it under a crushing load.  test how it
works for you.


craig sanders <cas@taz.net.au>

BOFH excuse #11:

magnetic interference from money/credit cards

Reply to: