dirvish vs rdiff-backup (was Re: Changing the default simlink to sh [was: Password file with over 3000 users.])

To: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Cc: debian-isp@lists.debian.org
Subject: dirvish vs rdiff-backup (was Re: Changing the default simlink to sh [was: Password file with over 3000 users.])
From: Dan MacNeil <dan@thecsl.org>
Date: Fri, 28 Sep 2007 15:06:52 -0400
Message-id: <[🔎] 46FD50CC.6000300@thecsl.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 46FBFEDA.9090604@goirand.fr>
References: <[🔎] 20070925083334.GB6130@fantomas.sk> <[🔎] 20070925084655.GC17081@taz.net.au> <[🔎] 46F8FB74.1030701@goirand.fr> <[🔎] 20070925230838.GE17081@taz.net.au> <[🔎] 46F9DB3D.1070201@goirand.fr> <[🔎] 20070926073929.GI17081@taz.net.au> <[🔎] 46FA206A.8030803@goirand.fr> <[🔎] F6CC648E-3735-4125-B764-0AD44E145254@natetech.com> <[🔎] 46FB2C05.5050400@goirand.fr> <[🔎] 46FB4DCF.3020102@natetech.com> <[🔎] 20070927171313.GB15758@kitenet.net> <[🔎] 46FBFEDA.9090604@goirand.fr>

Thomas Goirand wrote:
[snip]

We are going to set it [snipped] up on all of our location for doing

> backups with dirvish.

We're using rdiff-backup through backup-ninja and are only 90% happywith it. Sarge/Etch rdiff-backup archives aren't comparable. Syntax forrecovering from backups older than a day requires a trip the man page.


How does dirvish compare to rdiff-backup ?

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: dirvish vs rdiff-backup (was Re: Changing the default simlink to sh [was: Password file with over 3000 users.])
  - From: Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr>
- Re: dirvish vs rdiff-backup (was Re: Changing the default simlink to sh [was: Password file with over 3000 users.])
  - From: Keith Edmunds <kae@midnighthax.com>

References:
- Re: Password file with over 3000 users.
  - From: Matus UHLAR - fantomas <uhlar@fantomas.sk>
- Re: Password file with over 3000 users.
  - From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Password file with over 3000 users.
  - From: Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr>
- Re: Password file with over 3000 users.
  - From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Password file with over 3000 users.
  - From: Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr>
- Re: Password file with over 3000 users.
  - From: Craig Sanders <cas@taz.net.au>
- Re: Changing the default simlink to sh [was: Password file with over 3000 users.]
  - From: Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr>
- Re: Changing the default simlink to sh [was: Password file with over 3000 users.]
  - From: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
- Re: Changing the default simlink to sh [was: Password file with over 3000 users.]
  - From: Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr>
- Re: Changing the default simlink to sh [was: Password file with over 3000 users.]
  - From: Nate Duehr <nate@natetech.com>
- Re: Changing the default simlink to sh [was: Password file with over 3000 users.]
  - From: Joey Hess <joeyh@debian.org>
- Re: Changing the default simlink to sh [was: Password file with over 3000 users.]
  - From: Thomas Goirand <thomas@goirand.fr>

Prev by Date: Emailing: Aplikasi (KTTA) a/n. RAYMOND. R - BATAM
Next by Date: Re: dirvish vs rdiff-backup (was Re: Changing the default simlink to sh [was: Password file with over 3000 users.])
Previous by thread: Re: Changing the default simlink to sh [was: Password file with over 3000 users.]
Next by thread: Re: dirvish vs rdiff-backup (was Re: Changing the default simlink to sh [was: Password file with over 3000 users.])
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread