Re: Quagga (Two AS in one router)
> On 25/07/2007, at 3:19 PM, Wojciech Ziniewicz wrote:
>> That's a nice note, but assuming that we have x routers with y ASes on
>> them, what will be the information propagated to the internet ?
>> I think that it's meaningless to set up such a solution .
You are thinking globally, You must separe x routers with y ASes is not
correct interpretation:
We have y ASes with x/y routers within them :)
> Normally, 1 router, 1 AS...
> Multiple ASes, Multiple routers.
router is always in only one AS .... that is correct mr. Miehs ;)
> Wojciech Ziniewicz wrote:
> sry, should be "peered" with 3 ASes. here in poland i'm peered >
with a global mesh of asses 1. transit global which has 222088 >
routes, 2. polish transit with 3992 routers and our own > exchange
centre ( ACX ) with 1094 lines. Of course we're
> using external bgp.
That sounds better :). It sounds like we don't understand each other :D.
So You are trying to make something like this :
| |
|IBGP |
______|_____|___
EBGP | | EBGP
1.AS ------------| your ROUTER |---------------- 2. AS
| your AS |
|______________|
|
|EBGP
|
3.AS
This is normal, and there should be any problem.
You CANNOT implement something like this:
your Router
_________________
|1.AS |
| 2.AS |-> router is internal for more than 1 AS
| |
| 3.AS |
-----------------
Tomfi
PS: quagga(Zebra) must work well because here in Czech republic they use
it in Cesnet Backbone.
Reply to: