Re: More sorbs blacklisting
> > > Am 2006-08-08 09:38:54, schrieb Brett Parker:
> > > > (a) SORBS are feeding you royalties
> > > > (b) Your head is so far up your arse that everything that you say
> > > > *must* be right
> > > > (c) You're Joerg Schilling in disguise (oh, wait, that's covered by b)
> >
> > On 23.08.06 18:13, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> > > Hey, not SORBS but anoter less important RBL has listed the
> > > half of my DLS Network in Paris...
> Am 2006-08-25 13:49:19, schrieb Matus UHLAR - fantomas:
> > what dns names do they use?
On 26.08.06 22:09, Michelle Konzack wrote:
> They have <lineX.ipdslamN.mydomain.net> if the customers
> do not want to host anything there own.
>
> Where X is 01 to 24 and N is 01 to 04 currently
>
> > do they have statically assigned IP's?
>
> Yes.
I think this is clearly the case where statically assigned IPs have generic
DSL names, which leads to the expectation they are dynamically assigned
(imho, no wonder).
I recommend changing them to advise they are statically assigned, e.g.
<staticX.ipdslamN.mydomain.net>, register them in whois DB as such and mail
to that list' admins.
--
Matus UHLAR - fantomas, uhlar@fantomas.sk ; http://www.fantomas.sk/
Warning: I wish NOT to receive e-mail advertising to this address.
Varovanie: na tuto adresu chcem NEDOSTAVAT akukolvek reklamnu postu.
I just got lost in thought. It was unfamiliar territory.
Reply to: