On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 04:26:32PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote: > On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 06:19:21PM +0200, Hans du Plooy wrote: > > On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 15:37 +0000, Andy Smith wrote: > > > It really depends on which of the SORBS DNSBLs you are on, since > > > they all have differwent criteria and policies. > > > > Which RBLs would you recommend, should someone want to use it? > > Of the SORBS ones I only use the DUL to reject at SMTP time. Others > are used by SpamAssassin's scoring (whatever the default settings of > SA are). > My colo box recently got caught by this, despite it being a blatently static range. It took SORBS 3 months to remove the range from the blacklist. I really don't reccomend it :) Neil -- A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion Q. Why is top posting bad? gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature