[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: OT: sorbs blacklisting scam

On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 04:26:32PM +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 20, 2006 at 06:19:21PM +0200, Hans du Plooy wrote:
> > On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 15:37 +0000, Andy Smith wrote:
> > > It really depends on which of the SORBS DNSBLs you are on, since
> > > they all have differwent criteria and policies.
> > 
> > Which RBLs would you recommend, should someone want to use it?
> Of the SORBS ones I only use the DUL to reject at SMTP time.  Others
> are used by SpamAssassin's scoring (whatever the default settings of
> SA are).

My colo box recently got caught by this, despite it being a blatently
static range. It took SORBS 3 months to remove the range from the
blacklist. I really don't reccomend it :)

A. Because it breaks the logical sequence of discussion
Q. Why is top posting bad?
gpg key - http://www.halon.org.uk/pubkey.txt ; the.earth.li B345BDD3

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Digital signature

Reply to: