Re: Dynamic or Static routing
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
If you need to ask these questions then static routing is more than
adequate.
You need dynamic routing where you have multiple paths through your
network.
IE: Load balancing/ Fail-over lines inside your network. (Although
you could
use metrics and static routes here if it is a very simple network).
RIP is NEVER a solution for a service provider. OSPF and IS-IS are two
of the most used solutions, although I do know of one instance where
a larger
provider ran there customer routes through iBGP.
These requirements also change on whether you want to run MPLS in
your core.
My recommendation - if you have a simple network, keep it simple by
using statics.
Andrew
On Feb 6, 2006, at 11:40 PM, Léo Goehrs wrote:
Static routes is definitely a bad idea, in medium to large
nerworks, prefer OSPF☺
Leo Goehrs
Hello,
Do anyone use or have a complete static-routing based
network for customers (Cable Modem, DSL, dial-up, etc.) and/or
backbone? Why static routing could be better than dynamic routing
(RIPv2 or OSPF)?
Thanks in advance.
Saludos. Pablo.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFD59esW126qUNSzvURAh+NAJ9xi1D2abYDmj17HSahwHQvfVHdnACghivv
awfsHpZ+AK8z9tl0wKX2DuI=
=c+It
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: